Some GOP pundits like what they see in Ohio Gov. John Kasich. An even tempered man who has done well by his state. Unless of course you read other stories that indicate otherwise.
A Dayton Daily News article from 2012 shows a different thought process about Gov. Kasich.
The article reports: “As he travels around Ohio, Gov. John Kasich regularly points out that the state’s unemployment rate is a full percentage point lower than the national average, and more than 123,000 jobs have been created under his watch.
But a Dayton Daily News investigation shows taxpayers are paying a high price for some of those jobs. Kasich’s administration approved $487.7 million in taxpayer-subsidized tax credits, grants and low-cost loans for businesses during 2011, a 44.3 percent increase over the $337.9 million approved in 2010.
More than $200 million of the 2011 incentives came in the form of tax credits to companies that simply agreed to keep existing jobs in Ohio after threatening to leave the state, the Daily News found.
Among 16 states with tax credits for job creation and retention, Ohio has the largest number of recipient companies, with 567, according to an April report by Good Jobs First, a Washington, D.C.-based incentives watchdog group. These incentives give companies tax credits equal to a percentage of their employees’ withheld state income taxes.
The use of such incentives, commonplace across the country, is increasingly coming under fire as companies get breaks for moving within states and, in some cases, within metropolitan areas. Companies that get incentives frequently miss their employment pledges.”
Now in a July, 2015, education piece about Gov. Kasich, the Washington Post reports:
“Meanwhile, the Ohio Education Department in Kasich’s administration is in turmoil. David Hansen, his administration’s chief for school choice and charter schools resigned over this past weekend after admitting that he had unilaterally withheld failing scores of charter schools in state evaluations of the schools’ sponsor organizations so they wouldn’t look so bad. (Hansen’s wife, incidentally, is Kasich’s chief of staff, who is taking a leave from that post to work on his campaign.) There are growing calls now for the resignation of the Kasich-backed state superintendent of education, Richard Ross.”
So again we have a conservative trumpeting something but having to fudge numbers or flat out lie about achievements. Can not any of these Folk actually have an honest conversation with the American people and not use mistruths to represent them.
After a while it just gets tiring and any complaints that Republicans have about liberals should first be asked of themselves and their self-righteous leaders who again, paternalistically know what is best for us all.
Gov. Scott Walker hates union. That seems to be an excepted fact, and one in which he campaigned on for his role of governor of the state of Wisconsin. He dislikes unions, except for those he doesn’t dislike.
Walker made an exception for firefighters and police unions when he waged his war on public sector unions in his state.
But in a recent Washington Post piece Walker now wants to be rid of all public unions.
The author of the piece writes: “I have no doubt that Walker is sincere in his desire to see every labor union crushed and every vestige of workers’ power banished — or, in his lingo, “flexibility.” I’d also be surprised if any of the other candidates objected to any part of it. So the plan is worth understanding if you want to grasp what today’s GOP is offering today’s workers.
While he doesn’t say so explicitly, what Walker seems to hope for is really a world without any labor unions at all, or at the very least a world where unions are so weakened that they are unable to advocate for anyone. Here are the major parts of his plan:
Eliminate the National Labor Relations Board. Walker says the NLRB is “a one-sided advocate for big-labor special interests,” but the truth is that Democrats appoint pro-labor members to the board, while Republicans appoint anti-labor members to the board. Transferring the NLRB’s authority to adjudicate labor disputes to the courts would probably be a mixed bag in terms of worker rights.
“Eliminate big-government unions.” This is pretty straightforward. You don’t like unions? Get rid of ’em. Today there are around seven million Americans represented by a public sector union, and around one million of those are employed by the federal government (including the Postal Service). If Walker got his way, the latter group could kiss their representation goodbye — and given his record, it’s pretty clear he wouldn’t mind getting rid of the state and local public-sector unions as well.
Institute a national “right to work” law. The phrase “right to work” is a triumph of conservative PR, because how could anyone object to a right to work? What it means in practice, however, is that in places where unions negotiate salaries and benefits for workers, those workers can’t be required to contribute to the union that got them those salaries and benefits (no one can be required to join a union, but where there are no right to work laws, you can be required to contribute when the union negotiates on your behalf). Whenever a right to work law is being debated in a particular state, Republicans argue that because the law would weaken unions, it will draw employers who don’t want to have to bother with the high wages and good benefits those unions can negotiate.”
So Walker does not only dislike unions, he dislikes workers. It’s a wonder when Republicans say people shouldn’t have to pay the union to represent them but then say unions must represent workers in a workplace with a union. How is that logical. One drives a car but doesn’t believe in car insurance, but is forced to buy it.
Maybe in right to work states employers should negotiate with those workers and their union for their benefits and salaries. But then have to negotiate separately with all the other employees for their benefits and salaries.
The employer is making the choice, and it would as they are so fond of saying, the cost of doing business.
It’s pretty evident by now that Republicans want anything they don’t like or believe helps should be done away with, even if no laws have been broken. They very paternalistically believe what they know is right is right.
The continued onslaught for defunding Planned Parenthood without any laws being broken is pretty evident of this hell hat no fury like Republicans’ angst.
In a recent article by the publication The Hill it is reported:
“In more than two months of investigations, members have yet to turn up evidence that Planned Parenthood acted illegally, the same conclusion reached by a half-dozen state investigations. The Department of Justice has so far declined to launch a formal probe. Several Republicans acknowledged this week that they may never find proof of wrongdoing at Planned Parenthood — but said it doesn’t matter.
“I don’t know whether we’re ever going to be able to answer that question, whether it was illegal for them to do what they were doing,” Rep. Raúl Labrador (R-Idaho) said during the House’s first hearing on the topic Wednesday. “I don’t know if it was illegal … but it was immoral, what was seen on that video.”
Whether one agrees with what the videos showed or not, the law and order party is all about its own law and order. Which begs the questions how “Christian” Republicans can get along with “Jewish” Republicans since their faith doesn’t necessarily intersect always in a good way.
Again, that party’s paternalistic we know what is better for you than is evident. Interesting that science has proven cancer is bad for a person. Yet the Republican party does not require MRI’s of smokers, forcing them the smokers to look at those images to show how bad smoking is for their body. They don’t do invasive probes to retrieve cells for testing to show those smokers how bad it is for their bodies.
The Washington Post did a recent story about the reality of one Planned Parenthood facility in Ohio. The reporter talks with clinicians and patients alike. The story begins:
“There they were, in a state whose attorney general had recently opened an investigation of Planned Parenthood, in a country where House and Senate members were threatening to shut down the federal government over Planned Parenthood funding, at a time when an antiabortion group was releasing weekly videos that purported to show the organization’s employees talking about selling fetal tissue for profit — and in a universe where Planned Parenthood had again become a symbol for one of the most divisive moral battles of the modern era.
Moore wrote the prescription, then moved on to her next patient.
This clinic sees nearly 7,100 patients a year, most of them young and poor. The clinicians administer 3,400 pregnancy tests, write 2,900 prescriptions for birth control and provide 13,200 screenings for sexually transmitted infections to the women and men walking into a boxy building between a restaurant-supply store and a used-car dealership. Inside the clinicians’ office, a pamphlet on the wall reads “Bomb Threat Checklist.”
The article also states: “Like nearly half of Planned Parenthood’s facilities nationwide, Akron doesn’t perform abortions. Three of the organization’s 27 centers in Ohio do; the nearest is in Bedford Heights, where protesters regularly picket. When pregnancy tests come back as unwanted positives, those patients are referred to Bedford Heights, 26 miles away.”
So much angst, so much vitriolic anger. Yet no action to find ways to help these people who come to the Planned Parenthood facility for treatment and their individual healthcare needs.
But it seems Republicans only care about flash and showy kinds of stuff. Wars, the making of a free market with plenty of free money for those willing to work hard.
No effort to help those less fortunate except to say they are not working hard enough. No effort to rein in those unnecessary health care costs. To rein in those unnecessary insurance costs. Of course that might cut into their own source of income. If they tried to regulate the growing costs of health care and insurance costs, they would be upsetting their wealthy friends and impeding the free market place.
The free market place is only free is one has money to spend, and with the current trend of the middle class with less disposable income they may be a lot fewer who are free, in the land of the home and the brave.
A large crowd turned out for the Northwest Iowa Labor Council’s Labor Day picnic, with support by affiliated unions to celebrate the working man and woman. The picnic lunch and speakers both outline a strong work ethic and need for laborers which seldom seems celebrated by conservatives. Which is interesting, because without labor, businesses would be hard pressed to produce anything. And without a work force able to buy the goods produced, the economy conservatives tout so readily would not exist.
So one day out of the year, the “lowly” worker who does manual labor gets to relax and enjoy the camaraderie of friends and associates with like minds.
The Washington Post’s columnist E.J. Dionne wrote a thoughtful piece over the weekend.
His piece begins:“Many conservatives and most libertarians argue that every new law or regulation means that government is adding to the sum total of oppression and reducing the freedom of individuals.
This way of looking at things greatly simplifies the political debate. Domestic issues are boiled down to the question of whether someone is “pro-government” or “anti-government.”
He writes about the protection of workers’ rights and the National Labor Relations Board. He talks about franchise businesses and the fact that the corporations that detail and direct everything about the franchises then deny any responsibility to how workers for these businesses should behave, dress and do business.
His piece says: “Among the milestones Scheiber cited was a recent U.S. Court of Appeals decision upholding an Obama-era rule providing minimum-wage and overtime protections to nearly 2 million home health-care workers. They certainly felt empowered by government, not oppressed. So did the employees of contractors and franchises who were granted collective bargaining rights by the National Labor Relations Board.”
He also goes on to write about having protections from financial advisors who actually give advice that help clients and not line their own pockets by pushing certain types of investments that pays them commissions, but may perform poorly for the investor.
He writes: “The investment-rule battle is a near-perfect example of how the government is plainly promoting free markets — what’s more market-oriented than building an investment portfolio? — but is also trying to make sure that the rules regulating the investments tilt toward the interests of the individual putting money at risk.
As long as there are markets, government will have to establish rules determining how they operate. These necessarily affect the interests of market participants. Many of the choices are not between more or less government. They are about whether what government does provides greater benefit to workers or employers, management or unions, individual investors or investment firms.”
So it is true that not everyone dislikes government and that it is not helpful and stands in the way of people trying to further themselves. And it doesn’t depend on which side of an equation one stands on. Rather how one looks at that help, or for some, hindrance.
In the news recently is the fervor of conservative Republicans going after Planned Parenthood, wanting to defund an organization that offers health care to lower income individuals and vilifying it for laws it has not broken.
Florida’s Gov. Rick Scott orders a review of the 16 Planned Parenthood clinics in his state to see if any laws were broken.
It is reported by Politico that the results of the review didn’t sit well with the governor or his staff, in that the review didn’t contain the results any of them were looking for.
Gov. Rick Scott’s office scrubbed a press release written by his own regulators that found there was no “mishandling of fetal remains” at clinics run by Planned Parenthood and, at the same time, said it would refer doctors who worked at those clinics to the state Board of Medicine for possible disciplinary action.
The governor’s favorite bike has a back story that he conveniently ignores.
“For Republican presidential candidate Scott Walker, the Harley-Davidson motorcycle is a symbol of American freedom, independence and his own status as a regular guy. He rides a hog and has made the iconic machine a centerpiece of his campaign, staging events at Harley dealerships and even invoking the brand during his closing statement in last week’s debate.
While it may seem natural for a Wisconsin governor to tout the product of a company headquartered in his state, there are ironies in Walker’s embrace. Harley’s success has been helped by two entities that the budget hawk has built his reputation battling: government and labor unions.
Since 2000, the motorcycle manufacturer has benefited from $54.5 million in local and state subsidies and more than $2 billion in federal liquidity support, according to Good Jobs First, a group in Washington that monitors business incentives.
Harley has won praise for working with its unions to make production more efficient. That stands in contrast with Walker’s message that he “took on the unions and won.” The two-term governor rose to national prominence after confronting public-sector unions in Wisconsin, transforming him into a hero for many conservatives.”
Yeah, well maybe the unions can’t spend as much as his more moneyed friends like the Koch brothers.
He should eschew his like for a Harley and ride a bike manufactured by his buds. Oh wait, they don’t make an iconic American motorcycle.
Well, that’s inconvenient for an aspiring politician.
Wisconsin’s Gov. Scott Walker’s apparent appeal appears to be waning for the GOP members in Iowa. Although it is still early.
There are so many stories about Walker’s missteps, misdeeds and other tales. Here are a few. A couple of these news stories date back to 2012 and involve homeowners who were preyed upon by unscrupulous bankers.
“Yesterday, 49 states joined the federal government in announcing a $26 billion settlement with five of the nation’s biggest banks over the banks’ foreclosure fraud abuses. The money from the settlement is meant to aid homeowners who lost their homes to foreclosure or who find themselves underwater, meaning they owe more on their mortgage than their home is currently worth.
However, Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) — whose high profile assault on workers’ rights has prompted a recall effort against him — isn’t planning to use the money to help homeowners. Under the terms of the settlement, Wisconsin is set to receive $140 million, $31.6 million of which comes directly to the state government. And Walker is planning to use $25.6 million of that money to help balance his state’s budget:
Of a $31.6 million payment coming directly to the state government, most of that money – $25.6 million – will go to help close a budget shortfall revealed in newly released state projections. [Wisconsin Attorney General J.B. Van Hollen], whose office said he has the legal authority over the money, made the decision in consultation with Walker.
“Just like communities and individuals have been affected, the foreclosure crisis has had an effect on the state of Wisconsin, in terms of unemployment. … This will offset that damage done to the state of Wisconsin,” Walker said.”
What a nice guy, not. Help his state’s citizens. No. What should the citizens of the U.S. expect from such a person. Deceit?
The Wisconsin State Journal asked some questions about such a deal. The story states:
“Republican Gov. Scott Walker decided to use the bulk of the money — $24.3 million — to pump up the state’s general fund. The rest, Walker assured, would be used to mitigate the damage caused by the foreclosure crisis, including helping blighted areas of Milwaukee and bolstering training for prosecutors to go after mortgage and foreclosure fraud.
The state Department of Justice, which is overseeing that remaining $5.9 million, echoed those comments late last month, telling the State Journal that the bulk of that money had been allocated to help homeowners and combat fraud, including helping homeowners reach mediated settlements with lenders, anti-blight and economic development projects and training and staffing for financial fraud and consumer protection efforts.
But about $2 million of that money million is targeted for pay raises for DOJ attorneys and assistant district attorneys across the state, to fund tribal law enforcement and for victim/witness programs — uses that Milwaukee Mayor Tom Barrett said are at best marginally related to the purpose of the funds.”
A more recent story in Newsweeks tells a tale of Wisconsin State Supreme Court justices that are beholden to Gov. Walker and some of his electoral pals, apparently raising the issue of whether they were bought and paid for.
“The Wisconsin Supreme Court is facing harsh criticism for a blatant conflict of interest in a July 16 ruling to shut down a campaign finance investigation of Gov. Scott Walker’s 2012 re-election campaign.
One headline referred to the court as a “crony court.” A Wisconsin columnist called the justices “self-serving” and concluded, “Justice bought is justice denied.”
Why? The justices in the majority have benefited from $10 million in spending by the same special interest groups that were suspected of conspiring with Walker.
The court’s ruling explicitly ordered an end to the investigation into whether Walker’s campaign illegally “coordinated” with groups running ads on his behalf, including Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce (WMC).
The court ruled that the Walker campaign’s activities were not coordination, because the ads did not explicitly say to vote for the governor. The ads were deemed “issue ads” that merely praised Walker for his record as governor, just before the election. The court ruled that banning coordination for issue ads would violate the First Amendment.
Prosecutors should appeal the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s decision. The U.S. Supreme Court, by hearing this case, could help protect the integrity of the judiciary in Wisconsin and other states with elected judges. Prosecutors have a strong argument that the Wisconsin justices had an unconstitutional conflict of interest. In addition to the multimillion-dollar ad campaigns for the justices, the prosecutors described “close connections” between WMC and two of their campaigns.”
And then there is Walker’s stance on China’s premier’s state visit to the U.S.
“He talks a good game about how tough he will be on China as president. But his record as governor of Wisconsin suggests a softer, cozier policy.
In an interview, he brushed off his party’s concerns about trade with China, downplayed citizens’ worries about outsourcing, and called the country’s trade practices “good and fair.”
That governor was Scott Walker—the same governor who, on Tuesday, confused just about everyone by saying Obama should make the Chinese president cancel his upcoming state visit. Same guy.”
Tell your Republican friends Gov. Walker needs to be more honest, as it’s probably true of they may be saying about some Democratic candidates.
So the GOP world in Iowa is in a recent uproar of Sam Clovis’ defection from Rick Perry’s presidential campaign to Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
Clovis seems to be practicing what he must teach as a business and public policy instructor at Morningside College.
Follow the money.
It only makes sense to work for someone if they are going to pay you, otherwise, you are a volunteer.
That is the perception sending shudders through the state’s Republicans, after the leader of Rick Perry’s Iowa campaign quit when Mr. Perry suspended pay to staff members, then quickly went to work for Donald J. Trump, who he had earlier said lacked a “moral center.”
The head-spinning dismount and remount came three weeks after another embarrassing episode for the state’s Republicans. A long-running scandal over under-the-table payments to a state senator to endorse Ron Paul’s presidential bid in 2011 led to the federal indictment this month of Mr. Paul’s former campaign manager.”
As a matter of public policy it is always good to know where the money is going and from whom.
Would Mr. Clovis be a good instructor if he showed his students that they should work for nothing? He seems to be putting into practice what he must teach his students.